Advertising and coronavirus – jurisprudence of German courts
The tendency to use more or less suggestive references to the fight with corona virus in advertising since the beginning
Read moreThe tendency to use more or less suggestive references to the fight with corona virus in advertising since the beginning
Read moreThe electricity supplier presented on its own website the price tariff and compared it with the tariffs of other local
Read moreEveryone who runs a household knows well what the fixed costs of living mean. Whether it is rent, water or
Read moreMarking products with the prefixes “eco” or “bio” is subject to control under EU Regulation no 834/2007. Their use in
Read moreThe Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 12 October 2017 in case C-289/16 interpreted the
Read moreThe Regional Court in Karlsruhe in the judgment of 21 March 2019 stated that influencers who publish on Instagram and
Read moreThe Higher Regional Court in Celle on 8 June 2017 delivered the judgment in which it stated that the big
Read moreThe Higher Regional Court in Berlin in the judgment of 8 January 2019 stated that not every influencer’s post which
Read moreHigher Regional Court in Cologne examined the question of legal admissibility of offering software blocking online advertising. The publisher of
Read moreIn the judgment of 21st July 2016, the German Tribunal of Justice defined/stipulated what criteria must be met so that
Read more